|

The attitudes
and values held by faculty members permeate their classroom
environments. Recognizing the impact of personal views and gaining
insight into working with students with disabilities may assist in
creating a supportive educational environment. While not comprehensive,
the following citations may offer ideas for improving your learning
environment. Please contact CAN for ideas, questions or additional
information.
Bettie, John
R., Anderson, Ronald J., & Antonak, Richard F. 1997. Modifying
attitudes of prospective educators toward students with disabilities
and their integration into regular classrooms. Journal of
psychology, 13(3), pp. 245-259.
Abstract.
Prospective educators (aged 18 – 60 years) who completed an
introductory special education course were participants in a study
investigating whether attitudes toward students with disabilities
and toward their integration into regular classrooms would be
influenced by viewing videotapes that presented positive portrayals
of persons with disabilities in regular settings and by the
disability characteristics of the professor who taught the course.
Results showed that those who viewed the video tapes expressed more
favorable attitudes toward students with disabilities only when the
course was taught by a professor with a visible physical
disability. With regard to attitudes toward the integration of
students with disabilities into regular classrooms, neither viewing
the videotapes nor the disability characteristics of the professor
who taught the course were related to the expression of more
favorable attitudes.
Brownlee,
JoAnne and Carrington, Suzanne. (2000). Opportunities for authentic
experience and reflection: a teaching program designed to change
attitudes towards disability for pre-service teachers. Support
for learning, 15(3), pp.99 – 105.
Abstract.
Teachers increasingly need to manage and interact effectively with a
broad range of students, including those with disabilities.
Positive interactions require positive attitudes toward children
with disabilities. In this qualitative study from Australia, Joanne
Brownlee and Suzanne Carrington investigate the beliefs and
attitudes towards people with disabilities of 11 pre-service
teachers. The results of this study have implications for the
structure of teacher education programs in generic teacher education
courses.
Conaster,
Phillip and Block, Martin. (2001). Aquatic instructors’ beliefs
toward inclusion. Therapeutic recreation journal, 35(2), pp.
170-184.
Abstract.
This study examined the
influence of moderating variables on aquatic instructors’ beliefs
toward teaching swimming to individuals with disabilities in an
inclusive setting. 111 aquatic instructors from 25 states
representing 108 US
cities participated in the study. Based on the theory of planned
behavior, aquatic instructors’ beliefs toward inclusion were
investigated. Results indicated that instructors currently teaching
aquatics classes to students with disabilities and who felt more
competent had more favorable beliefs (attitudes, subjective norm,
perceived behavioral control) toward including students with
disabilities. Further, instructors who felt competent and were
currently teaching students with disabilities significantly related
to academic coursework and experience. Approximately, one-half of
the surveyed instructors felt competent and were currently teaching
students with disabilities.
Fichten,
Catherine S. (1988). Students with physical disabilities in higher
education: Attitudes and beliefs that affect integration. In
Harold Yuker (Ed); et al. Attitudes toward persons with
disabilities, pp. 171-186. Springer Publishing Co, Inc.: New
York, NY.
Abstract.
(From the chapter) in the college context attempts to change
attitudes fall into four categories: contact along or in combination
with information, sensitization via role play exercises, tips for
the student who has a disability, and institutional changes.
Summarize the trends and, where possible, draw implications for the
successful integration of college students with a disability.
Summary of the attitudes of these groups and of the ways in which
these attitudes translate into behaviors that facilitate or hamper
the integration of college students who have a physical disability.
Attitudes of non-disabled students with a disability. Attitudes of
professors. Attitudes of student services personnel. Attitudes of
students with a disability. Institutional attitudes. Positivity
(sympathy) bias and response amplification.
Fichten, C., & Goodrick, G. (1990). Getting along in college:
Recommendations for college students with disabilities and their
professors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 34, 103-125.
Abstract: To
examine behaviors that promote effective teaching and learning and
facilitate problem-free interaction between professors and their
students with disabilities, 75 college students with disabilities
were interviewed, along with 57 professors who were nominated by one
or more of these students as one of their outstanding teachers.
Participants indicated their feelings and behaviors in a variety of
commonly occurring situations where professors and students with
disabilities might interact. They also indicated their thoughts and
feelings before and after taking action and rated the effectiveness
of each of their behaviors. Thoughts and feelings that facilitate or
hamper interaction between students with disabilities and their
professors are discussed along with the nature of effectiveness and
ineffective behaviors by both students and professors.
Recommendations are made concerning possible actions by
rehabilitation
professionals to facilitate effective interaction between students
with disabilities and their professors and to enhance the
teaching-learning process.
Fleming,
Michael. (2002). Chapter 12: Sources and information – community
college faculty. New directions for community colleges, 118,
pp. 117 – 123.
Abstract.
This annotated
bibliography presents additional information related to community
college faculty, including attitudes and perceptions, professional
development, faculty evaluation, and recruitment.
Folsom-Meek,
Sherry L. & Rizzo, Terry L. (2002). Validating the Physical
Educators’ Attitude Toward Teaching Individuals Disabilities III
(PEATID III) survey for future professionals. Adapted physical
activity quarterly, 19(2), pp. 141-154.
Abstract.
The purpose of this study was to assess validity and reliability of
the Physical Educators’ Attitude Toward Teaching Individuals with
Disabilities III (PEATID III: T. L. Pizzo, 1993) for future
professionals. The 3,464 participants (1,430 females and 2,133
males, mean age 22.94 years) were undergraduate students enrolled in
the introductory adapted physical education course at 235 colleges
and universities. Construct validity was obtained through principal
components analysis with oblique rotation and supported by principal
components analysis factors: (a) outcomes of teaching students with
disabilities in regular classes, (b) effects on student learning,
and (c) need for more academic preparation to teach students with
disabilities. Reliability, as estimated through coefficient alpha,
was .88 for the total scale and .71 or greater for each of the
disability subscales.
Ford, Alison,
Pugach, Marleen C., & Otis-Wilborn, Amy. (2001). Preparing general
educators to work well with students who have disabilities: what’s
reasonable at the pre-service level? Learning disability
quarterly, 24, pp. 275 – 285.
Abstract.
The restructured teacher
education program at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee is
described specifically with regard to its commitment to prepare
general educators to work effectively and responsibly with students
with disabilities. Background information is provided about the
program, including the features that support a strong relationship
between special and general educators. The authors discuss
reasonable outcomes for initial teachers in general education and
highlight some of the challenges in program implementation.
Gitlow, Lynn.
(2001). Occupational therapy faculty attitudes toward the inclusion
of students with disabilities in their educational programs.
Occupational therapy journal of research, 21(2), pp. 115 – 131.
Abstract.
This study investigated
the attitudes of occupational therapy (OT) and occupational therapy
assistant (OTA) educators (all Ss were aged 28 – 65 years) toward
the inclusion of students with disabilities in their educational
programs. A non-experimental design relying on a mailed survey was
the methodology selected to examine the following research
questions: (1) What are the attitudes of full-time OT and OTA
educators who teach in accredited programs in the US toward
inclusion of students with disabilities in their OT programs? And
(2) What factors are predictive of positive attitudes of OT faculty
toward including students with disabilities in their educational
programs? Results indicate that overall OT and OTA faculty have
favorable attitudes toward including students with disabilities in
their programs. However, consistent with the literature, these
attitudes are hierarchical. In other words, attitudes toward
inclusion of students with disabilities are different depending on
the nature of the disability.
Hebel, Sara.
2001. How a landmark anti-bias law changed life for disabled
students. Chronicle of higher education, 47(20), pp. A23 –
A25.
Abstract.
Describes one university’s efforts to make its services and
facilities accessible to students with disabilities, giving
considerable credit to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Describes the law’s effects on the campus as it enters into its
second decade, noting attention to glaring deficiencies,
highlighting problems that still exist, and discussing changes in
faculty attitudes.
Hill,
J. (1996). Speaking out: Perceptions of students with disabilities
regarding adequacy of services and willingness of faculty to make
accommodations. Journal of Postsecondary Education and
Disability, 12, 22-43.
Abstract:
Survey
of 264 Canadian university students with disabilities found most
considered campus support services good or excellent. One-third felt
needs were not met; one-fourth found lack of support had hindered
their ability to pursue postsecondary education. Two-thirds found
faculty very willing to make accommodations, but lack of
accommodation had seriously affected one-third. Recommendations for
improvement are offered.
Hodge, Samuel
R., Davis, Ronald, Woodard, Rebecca & Sherrill, Claudine. (2202)
Comparison of practicum types in changing pre-service teachers’
attitudes and perceived competence. Adapted physical activity
quarterly, 19(2), pp. 155-171.
Abstract.
Compared the effects of
two practicum types (off campus and on campus) on physical education
teacher education (PETE) students’ attitudes and perceived
competence toward teaching school-aged students with physical
disabilities or moderate-severe mental retardation. Male and female
PETE students, enrolled in a 15-week introductory adapted physical
education (APE) course and involved in eight sessions of either
off-campus (n=22) or on-campus (n=15) practicum experiences,
completed T. L. Rizzo’s (1993a) Physical Educators’ Attitudes Toward
Teaching Individuals with Disabilities-III (PEATID-III) two times.
Analysis of pre-test data revealed that groups were equated on
gender, experience, attitude, and perceived competence.
Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA revealed no significant difference between
practicum types on post-test attitude and perceived competence
measures. Attitude scores did not differ significantly from
pre-test to post-test. Perceived competence improved significantly
from pre-test to post-test under both practicum types. Implications
for professional preparation are discussed.
Author(s): Jensen, J., McCrary,
N, Krampe, K., & Cooper, J. (2004). Trying to do the right thing:
Faculty attitudes toward accommodating students with learning
disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability,
17, 81-90.
Abstract: The study
explores faculty attitudes toward students with disabilities at a
large research university. In the first phase of a three-year
demonstration project, 14 instructional staff, including teaching
assistants, faculty, and faculty serving as administrators, were
interviewed to determine their informational needs and attitudes
toward students with disabilities. Analysis of these narrative
interviews reveals that the participants viewed learning
disabilities differently from other disabilities and had questions
regarding providing classroom accommodations for students with
learning disabilities. This uncertainty stems from preexisting
attitudes toward students in general, principles from academic
freedom, and questions of the legitimacy of learning disability
diagnosis. Recommendations for open discussion of faculty and
student responsibilities toward teaching and leaning on campus are
discussed.
Kozeracki,
Carol A. (2002). Chapter 5: Faculty attitudes about students.
New directions for community colleges, 118, pp. 47 – 55.
Abstract.
This chapter discusses
differing attitudes of faculty toward students, using results from
three national studies that compare community college faculty with
faculty at four-year institutions and from a recent study conducted
by the Center for the Study of Community Colleges to examine
differences within subgroups of two-year faculty.
Matthews, Peter
R., Anderson, David W., & Skolnick, Bruce D. (1987). Faculty
attitude toward accommodations for college students with learning
disabilities. Learning disabilities focus, 3(1), pp. 46 –
52.
Abstract.
For program-planning purposes, faculty at a small public university
were asked if they would make 23 accommodations to students with
documented learning disabilities. Accommodations focused on
instructional, assignment, and examination modifications. Special
assistance and academic policy/procedural alterations were also
examined. Data were analyzed using chi-square goodness-of-fit tests
to determine the significance of responses on the questionnaire.
Results showed that faculty were willing to make adjustments that
would help the learning disabled students compensate for their
disabling/handicapping condition. Statistically significant results
were obtained for all but one accommodation. When accommodations
would not be permitted by faculty, it was generally because these
adjustments differed too much in degree from the standards held for
all students. Implications, future research, and recommendations
based on these findings are discussed.
Pitcher, Jane
and Purcell, Kate. (1998). Diverse expectations and access to
opportunities: Is there a graduate labor market? Higher
education quarterly, 52(2), pp. 179-203.
Abstract.
Restructuring of the labor market has led to changing demand from
skills and concern about potential mismatch between needs of
employers and competences developed in higher education courses.
This paper extends analysis of the Great Expectations survey of UK
final-year undergraduates in 1996 to explore the development of
skills and competencies in different disciplinary areas and the
anticipated career trajectories of students. A detailed assessment
is undertaken of the extent to which respondents appear prepared,
both in terms of the employment-related skills they consider they
have developed as undergraduates and in their expectations, for the
changes which have taken place in the labor market in the later part
of the Twentieth Century. While findings from transitional early
career need to be interpreted cautiously, it does appear that
expectations varied less than emerging outcomes for this cohort in
the vanguard of mass higher education. Subject and gender
differences in expectations and outcomes were significant and
‘non-traditional’ graduates were more likely than others to report
that they were experiencing difficulties in the transition from
education to employment. The graduates themselves had a flexible
approach to the labor market, but it seems that employers may have
more inflexible recruitment graduate practices. Further research is
required but there is clearly a danger that wider access may not
lead to correspondingly wider career opportunities.
Rowley, Gill
and Purcell, Kate. (2001). Up to the job? Graduates’ perceptions of
the UK Higher education careers service. Higher education
quarterly, 55(4), pp. 416 – 435.
Abstract.
The article investigates graduates’ perceptions of their careers
guidance needs and the extent to which these are met by the higher
education careers service. It reports the findings of a survey
conducting by the Employment Studies Research Unit in support of the
work of the recent Higher Education Careers Service review Group
chaired by Professor Sir Martin Harris. It places the findings in a
context between recent and ongoing research on transitions from
higher education to employment and considers the implications of
these, and of wider changes in recruitment practices, for the role
of the higher education careers services.
Shapiro, Arthur
and Margolis, Howard. (1988). Changing negative peer attitudes
towards students with learning disabilities. Journal of reading,
writing, & learning disabilities international, 4(2), pp. 133 –
146.
Abstract.
Examines some of the reasons for prejudicial attitudes in
teachers and normal students toward students with learning
disabilities (SLDs) in mainstream classroom environments. It is
noted that SLDs may be misjudged by their teachers and classmates
because they possess handicaps that are not readily apparent.
Strategies for addressing prejudice include experiential disability
awareness programs, simulations of disability, and group
discussions. Examples of experiential simulations that have been
used to develop empathy toward and understanding of SLDs are
presented.
Tait, Kathleen
and Purdie, Nola. (2000). Attitudes toward disability: Teacher
education for inclusive environments in an Australian university.
International journal of disability, development and education,
47(1), pp. 25 – 38.
Abstract.
The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale (IDP) was used to
explore attitudes of pre-service teachers at a large Australian
University to people with disabilities. Using structural equation
modeling, the factor structure of the IDP Scale was tested. The
best fitting model was found to be one in which there were four
factors (Discomfort, Sympathy, Embarrassment, and Vulnerability)
that were derived from 16 items. Although significant effects were
found for type of course, age, gender, language, and frequency of
contact, the magnitude of these effects was minimal. Changes in
student teachers’ attitudes toward disability over a one year
general teacher training course were found to be minimal.
Thaman, Konai
H. (2002). Shifting sights: the cultural challenge of
sustainability. Higher education policy, 15, pp. 133-142.
Abstract.
This article focuses on the need for universities as teaching and
research organizations, to recognize and act upon a more culturally
inclusive interpretation of ‘sustainable development’ and
‘sustainability.’ It argues for the valuing of indigenous world
views as a means of achieving a more holistic and interdisciplinary
way of thinking about the Earth as the home of all people and as a
complement to the beliefs of western science and rational objective
thinking. At a more personal level, it challenges readers,
especially academics, to re-examine their own ways of thinking and
knowing for the sake of creating sustainable futures that are
inclusive in its processes, contexts, and outcomes.
Upton,
T. & Harper, D. (2002). Multidimensional disability attitudes and
equitable evaluation of educational accommodations by college
students without disabilities.
Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 15,115-30.
Abstract: Surveyed college students about their attitudes toward
educational accommodations and selected types of accommodations for
selected disabilities; examined the relationship of these variables
to gender and level of study. Found that general attitudes toward
accommodations varied significantly across gender, with females more
favorable than males, and that participants perceived selected
disabilities on a relatively stable continuum of "accommodation
deservedness.
Vogel, Susan
A., Leyser, Yona, Wyland, Sharon, & Brulle, Andrew. (1999).
Students with learning disabilities in higher education: Faculty
attitude and practices. Learning disabilities research &
practice, 14(3), pp. 173-186.
Abstract.
Prior research indicated that academic success for students with
learning disabilities (LD) is enhanced when faculty members are
willing to make accommodations. This investigation explored faculty
attitude and practices toward providing teaching and examination
accommodations for students with LD in higher education. All
full-time and part-time faculty teaching in a large Midwestern,
public, doctoral-granting university were asked to respond to a
survey regarding their background knowledge about learning
disabilities and the relevant legislation, their firsthand
experience teaching such students, their willingness to provide
accommodations, and their judgment of the fairness of providing
accommodations vis-à-vis students with out disabilities. Faculty
(N=140) indicated slightly greater willingness to provide teaching
accommodations as compared to examination accommodations (EA). The
highest level of willingness was reported for allowing students to
tape-record lectures. Faculty members were least willing to provide
supplementary materials such as an outline of their lecture or to
provide assignments in an alternative format. Faculty members were
most willing to allow extended time for exams and to allow exams to
be proctored in the office of support services for students with
disabilities. Faculty were least willing to alter the format of
examinations. Factors that may have influenced faculty attitude
include age, academic discipline, experience teaching students with
LD, years of teaching experience, and professional rank.
Wallace,
Barbara C. 2000. A call for change in multicultural training at
graduate schools of education: Educating to end oppression and for
social justice. Teachers college record, 102(6), pp. 1086 –
1111.
Abstract.
Graduate-level multicultural training is important for preparing
future teachers to work effectively with diverse students.
Professionals experienced in multiculturalism must revise and refine
multicultural training to better address immigrants’ diversity
issues and issues around sexuality, disability, and spirituality.
Those new to multiculturalism must prepare themselves, the
curriculum, and their departments for educating to end oppression
for social justice.
Wilson, Brian
and McCrary, Jan. (1996). The effects of instruction on music
educators’ attitudes toward students with disabilities. Journal
of research in music education, 44(1), pp. 26 – 33.
Abstract.
Before and after
completing a university course for teaching music to special
education learners, master’s-level music education students (N=18)
were given a measure examining their attitudes toward students with
disabilities. The survey instrument consisted of 20 statements
describing five different groups of students; these were learners
with emotional, physical, multiple, mental, or no impairments. The
participants were directed to indicate strength of agreement or
disagreement with the following statements: “I would feel
comfortable in interacting with this individual, “I would be willing
to work with this individual,” and “I would feel capable in working
professionally with this individual.” Results showed an increase in
the participants’ responses to the statement “I would feel more
capable in working professionally” but a statistically significant
decrease (p < .05) to the statement “I would be willing to work”
with special-needs learners after the completion of training.
Olney, M. F.,
& Brockelman, K. F., (2005). The Impact of Visibility of Disability
and Gender on the Self-Concept of University Students with
Disabilities. Journal of
Postsecondary Education and
Disability, 18(1),
80-91
Abstract: This study is the
result of a series of group and individual interviews in which 25
university students with a variety of disabilities discussed their
experience of disability. Transcripts of the interviews were
analyzed qualitatively using an inductive procedure. Data were then
sorted by gender and by hidden versus visible disability. Here we
present themes related to self-concept; specifically how the
students (1) thought of themselves, (2) presented themselves to
others, (3) imagined others’ views of them, and (4) perceived the
supports they received. Results of these analyses provide
indications of differences, both predictable and unexpected, between
the perceptions and experiences of men and women and between persons
with visible versus hidden disabilities. Implications of the study
for the delivery of services to students with disabilities are
explored
Antonak,
R.F., & Livneh, H. (2000). Measurement of attitudes towards persons
with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22(5), pp.
211-224.
Abstract:
The purpose of this paper is to assist those engaged in research
dealing with attitudes towards persons with disabilities by
presenting a catalogue of various attitude measurement methods.
Method: A
review of the methodological and psychological literatures on the
measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities.
Results: The
review uncovered 10 direct methods to measure attitudes, in which
the respondents are aware that they are participating in an
experiment and 14 indirect methods in four categories that are not
plagued by attitude-distorting influences because the respondents
are not aware that their attitudes are being measured. A discussion
of each method with examples is provided, followed by implications
for rehabilitation practitioners, rehabilitation education and
training, and rehabilitation researchers.
Conclusions:
The investigation of attitudes towards persons with disabilities
requires innovative experimental methods and psychometrically sound
instruments that are reliable, valid, and multidimensional. Without
such instruments, it will not be possible to obtain conclusive
answers to important research questions concerning the relationship
between these attitudes and the acceptance and integration of
persons with disabilities into society.
Royal, G.P.,
& Roberts, M.C. (1987).
Students' perceptions of and attitudes toward disabilities: A
comparison of twenty conditions. Journal of Clinical Child
Psychology, (16)2, pp.122-132.
Abstract:
We investigated students' perceptions of 20 different disabilities
in a within-subject design. Two between-subjects variables were also
employed: (a) sex of the participant and (b) grade level (3, 6, 9,
12, or college). Participants were read a brief definition of each
disability, and were then asked to rate the disability in terms of
its visibility, severity, acceptability, and familiarity. The
results indicated that (a) 6th and 12th graders were significantly
more accepting than 3rd graders; (b) in general, females were more
accepting than males, with males giving significantly higher ratings
of severity to four disabilities than did females; and (c) 3rd
graders gave the highest ratings of visibility, lowest ratings of
familiarity, and lowest ratings of acceptability. The implications
of these findings are discussed.
Malone, M.D.,
& Koblewski, P.J. (1999). Professionals' attitudes and perceptions
of teamwork supporting people with disabilities. Journal of
Developmental and Physical Disabilities, (11)2, pp.77-89.
Abstract:
The purpose of this project was to examine professional’s attitudes
and perceptions about teamwork and team processes. Thirty one
professionals who were serving on teams that support people with
disabilities were asked to complete two surveys: the Attitudes about
Teamwork Survey and the Team Process Perception Survey. Responses to
these surveys indicated a generally positive attitude about the team
process. Aspects of communication and investment of time and energy
were most highly rated. Central themes that emerged relative to
perceptions about benefits, limitations, and supports included,
respectively, disciplinary involvement, process barriers, and
collaboration. Respondents also provided recommendations for the
improvement of teamwork including the improvement of team structure,
process issues, and training. Practical implications of the results,
and directions for further investigation in this area, are
discussed.
Evans,
N.J., Assadi, J.L., &
Herriott, T.K. (2005).
Encouraging the development of disability allies.
New Directions for Student Services, 110, pp. 67-79.
Abstract:
The authors advocate for a constructionist interpretation of
disability, grounded in a social justice perspective, by discussing
disability paradigms, factors that influence attitudes and attitude
change regarding disability, and disability ally development and
behaviors.
Vehmas, S.
(2004).
Dimensions of disability.
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 13, pp.
34–40.
Abstract:
This article attempts to clarify the concept of disability by
explaining the ways in which it has been applied, and defined, by
both philosophers and disability scholars. Conceptual approaches to
disability can be divided into two main categories: the
individualistic and the social approaches. In the individualistic
framework, disability is seen as an individual condition that
results in a disadvantaged position regarding civic, economic, and
personal flourishing. This is the dominant view of disability in
bioethics. According to the social approaches, disability is seen as
a result of the oppressive material arrangements in existing
societies, or as a corollary of the prevailing cultural values,
ideas, attitudes, and language that produce and shape human reality.
I argue that disability is essentially a normative concept that
reflects the idea of what kind of beings humans ought to be, or, how
society ought to be constructed to treat its members equally. In
other words, the essential core of the concept of disability is
ethical, and this implies that ethical examination is needed to
provide a fuller picture of disability as a physical, psychological,
and social phenomenon.
|