|

Recognizing ways to create and
implement changes in the classroom is important. Information regarding
contemporary models and teaching techniques are included in this
section. The following citations may be of assistance in understanding
accommodation options in the classroom and give ideas to increase the
universality of the learning environment. Please
contact CAN for ideas, questions or additional information.
Aune, B. (2000). Career and
Academic Advising. New Directions for Student Services,
n91. 55-67.
Places the interactional model of disability in the context of
student development theory, asserting that interactions between the
individual and campus environment have a profound influence on
retention and completion for a disabled student. Relates various
service delivery approaches to the interactional model and suggests
how career and academic advisers can approach specific advising
issues from an interactional perspective. (Contains 43 references.)
(GCP)
Bragg, Debra D. (2002). Chapter
3: Contemporary vocational models and programs – what the research
tells us. Found in New Directions for Community Colleges, 117,
pp.25 -34.
Abstract. Drawing on
recent research, this chapter provides insights into contemporary
post-secondary vocational models and delivery strategies. The
strengths and weaknesses of various vocational models are discussed,
including what research says about program effectiveness and student
outcomes.
Conyers, L, & Szymanski, E. (1998). The effectiveness of an
integrated career intervention for college students with and without
disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability,
13(1), 23-34.
Abstract: A study investigated the effectiveness of a 10-hour,
4-session, integrated career decision-making intervention on 49
college students, 18 with disabilities. Results indicated
significant impact on both groups on several scales of career
decision-making and self-efficacy, confirming the efficacy of the
program.
McAlpine, L., Weston, C.,
Beauchamp, J., Wiseman, C., & Beauchamp, C. (1999). Building a
meta-cognitive model of reflection. Higher education, 37,
pp. 105 – 131.
Abstract.
An increased value is being placed on quality teaching in higher
education. An important step in developing approaches to better
instruction is understanding how those who are successful go about
improving their teaching. Thus, several years ago we undertook a
program of research in which the concept of “reflection” provided
the frame of reference. We envisaged reflection as a process of
formative evaluation, and also saw links between reflection and
meta-cognition. What we have documented and analyzed in detail are
the reflective processes of six university professors in their
day-to-day planning, instructing and evaluating of learners. The
result is a meta-cognitive model and coding scheme that
operationalize the process of reflection. Both provide a language
for describing reflection and therefore a way to process think about
how to improve teaching. In this paper, we describe the research and
the model and the contributions they make to our understanding of
teacher thinking in higher education.
Sharp, Stephen and McLaughlin,
Pat. (1997). Disseminating development initiatives in British
higher education: A case study. Higher Education, 33, pp.
309-329.
Abstract.
The effective Teaching and Assessment Program (ETAP) was
commissioned and funded by the Higher Education Funding Councils for
England, Scotland, and Wales and ran during the academic year
1993-1994. Its aim was to identify and disseminate best practice in
specific subject areas, student support, and resource based
learning. ETAP supported five projects, each undertaken by a
consortium of British higher education institutions. This paper
reports an evaluation of the program based on interviews with
leaders of the individual projects, along with a questionnaire
survey of potential users of the products of the program. A
framework is offered for interpreting the results of the
evaluation. Six different meanings of the word ‘dissemination’ are
identified, corresponding to the different degrees to which users
actively engage with the materials produced. These distinctions are
applied to the data collected and the findings are summarized in
terms of the key notions of awareness of what is available, the
attitude of teaching staff towards centrally-produced materials, and
the accessibility of those materials. The implications of these
three concepts are discussed in relation to the technical,
organizational and presentational issues which promote or hinder the
effectiveness of the dissemination. A number of policy
recommendations for Funding Councils and institutions are outlined.
Spruill, Jo Anna & Cohen, Libby
G. 1990. An analysis of the transition process in Maine.
Rural special education quarterly, 10(2), pp. 30 – 35.
Abstract.
Three Maine studies examined the school-to-work transition of
special needs students, focusing on (1) transition-related programs,
policies, and practices in Maine secondary schools; (2) educator
attitudes toward and opinions about transition services; and (3)
employment outcomes of special education higher school graduates.
Wilson, K. E. & Getzel, E. E.
(2001). Creating a Supportive Campus: The VCU Professional
Development Academy. Journal for Vocational Special Needs
Education., 23 (2). 12-18.
Abstract: Virginia Commonwealth University's model for
comprehensive disability services was developed following a survey
of students and key informants on existing services and staff. It
includes a professional development academy that provides first-line
staff training, graduate teaching assistant training, instructional
technology training, and a center for teaching excellence. (Contains
19 references.) (SK)
Zwart,
L., & Kallemeyn, L. (2001). Peer-based coaching for college students
with ADHD and learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary
Education and Disability,15(1), 1-15.
Abstract: Compared participants in a peer-based coaching program
for students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
and learning disabilities to non-participants. Found that peer-based
support may be an effective means for enhancing general
self-efficacy as well as some key areas of learning strategies and
study skills for college students with ADHD and learning
disabilities.
Serebreni, R., Rumrill, P., Mullins,
J. & Gordon, S. (1993). Project Excel: A demonstration of the Higher
Education Transition Model for high-achieving
students with disabilities. Journal of
Postsecondary Education and Disability,
10,(3), 15-23.
Project
Excel: University of Arkansas. Project Excel
(Serebreni, Rumrill, Mullins, & Gordon, 1993) was a six-week summer
transition program for high-achieving students with disabilities at the
University of Arkansas. This concentrated summer program was designed
to meet two objectives: assist students with disabilities in
transitioning to college and promote academic excellence. Project
activities were grouped into three categories: (a) psychosocial
adjustment and career development, (b) academic development, and (c)
university and community orientation.
Project Excel recruited
students with records of high academic achievement, described as a high
school grade-point average of 3.0 or higher and/or an American College
Testing Program composite score of 22 or higher. Local public school
guidance counselors, state vocational rehabilitation counselors, and the
university’s Admissions Office referred students to the project.
Twelve high-achieving
students with disabilities from Texas, Arkansas, and Illinois
participated in the program. Disability types represented among the
group were blindness, deafness, learning disability, spinal cord injury,
and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Project Excel activities
included career counseling, academic advising, assessment of academic
histories, accommodation planning, study skills instruction, technology
training, special events, recreational activities, new student
orientation, and peer mentoring. Students also enrolled in six
degree-credits spanning two freshman-level classes, English Composition,
and Techniques in Assistive Technology.
Most Project Excel
students were clients of the state-federal Vocational Rehabilitation
(VR) program, so project staff coordinated career counseling and
academic advising services with students’ VR counselors. This measure
ensured that the academic training students sought from the university
was compatible with the Individualized Written Rehabilitation Plans that
students had formulated to guide their VR cases. Project Excel students
were also encouraged to establish relationships with their faculty
advisors and to consider part-time employment (either on or off campus)
as a means of building their resumes and developing important career
preparatory skills. Each Project Excel student was also assigned a peer
mentor, an upper class student with a disability in each Project Excel
student’s academic area who provided valuable insight into life on
campus as well as into career prospects after graduation.
Rumrill, P., Roessler, R., Brown, P.
& Boen, L. (1994). Project career program planning guide.
Arkansas Research and Training Center in Vocational Rehabilitation,
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
Project Career:
University of Arkansas. Project Career had two guiding philosophies
in helping students with disabilities prepare for competitive careers.
The first was that anyone who wants to work can work and should be
encouraged to do so, regardless of disability. Second, students with
disabilities should have access to any and all services and programs
that are available to the general public (Rumrill, Roessler, Brown, &
Boen, 1994). The purpose of Project Career was to provide a continuum
of career services throughout the college experience from undergraduate
status to graduation for students with disabilities. Services and
activities included in this continuum were: career exploration and
job-seeking skills classes, individual career counseling, self-advocacy
training, a credit-bearing work experience program, a community-based
mentor program, placement assistance, and the Accommodations Planning
Team seminar.
Students with
disabilities participated in career exploration activities through
either a credit-bearing class or a mini-course with the goal of
narrowing career possibilities to specific career choices. They also
received instruction on skills for obtaining employment such as resume
writing, networking, and interviewing. Students also participated in a
learning module that addressed accommodation issues and civil rights
provisions in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Individual career
counseling was a featured component of Project Career. The issues
addressed in counseling dealt with disability as well as non-disability
related issues such as job-seeking and interviewing skills, selecting a
specific direction in the career field of interest, resume writing,
feelings of insufficient preparation, fear of failure, family
expectations, the social aspects of working, and goal-setting. Other
issues included self-esteem, prejudice, discrimination, disclosure,
self-advocacy, communication, safety, utilizing existing supports, and
coping with changes in one’s health status.
Self-advocacy training
consisted of a behavioral skills program designed to aid students in
requesting classroom accommodations from their instructors. The program
employed such social competence techniques as modeling, rehearsal, role
plays, and feedback to guide the conversation between students and
instructors in which students requested accommodations (Roessler,
Rumrill, & Brown 1998). Although the self-advocacy training was focused
on the classroom environment, students were reminded throughout the
training module that the same principals of effective self-advocacy that
enhance the likelihood of receiving classroom accommodations apply
directly to the process of requesting on-the-job accommodations.
Project Career’s Work
Experience program afforded University of Arkansas students with
disabilities the individualized career orientation opportunities they
may not otherwise have experienced to that point in their lives
(Burgstahler, 2001; Wehman, 2001). This program offered a
credit-bearing class in which students obtained “hands-on” contact with
the world of work. This program differed from typical internship
experiences in that it gave students the option of either a
complete-semester experience at one site of employment or a sequence of
short-term placements at several sites over the course of one or more
semesters. This provided flexibility to meet each students’ individual
needs. Students who required reasonable accommodations to complete the
Work Experience program were provided supports from the university’s
Office for Campus Access.
The Mentor program was a
companion service to the Work Experience program. This component
provided an organized opportunity for students with disabilities to meet
professionals in their chosen career fields. The students gained
invaluable information from the expertise and perspectives of their
mentors. The Mentor program allowed students to develop and practice
important networking skills. Activities and issues such as resume
writing tips, simulated job interviews, joining professional
organizations, disclosure of disability, requesting accommodations, and
socialization in the “corporate culture” were addressed in several
structured and informal meetings throughout the academic year.
Project
Career’s Accommodations Planning Team (APT) seminar (Rumrill, Roessler,
Boen, & Brown, 1995) was a job placement program for students with
disabilities who were preparing to graduate. The goals of the program
included teaching students to identify their accommodation needs when
entering the world of work, helping them understand the legal rights of
people with disabilities in employment, preparing students to discuss
their accommodation needs with employers in their chosen career fields,
and creating resource-directed plans for gaining entry-level positions
after graduation. The APT utilized a group approach to career planning,
matching students with disabilities with rehabilitation professionals
and employers from their chosen career fields. Prior to the half-day
program, the students received written orientation materials. They also
received information on interviewing skills, self-presentation,
interview etiquette, and commonly asked interview questions. The first
step in the APT program was practicing interviewing skills. This was
achieved by having the students and their matched employers simulate an
abbreviated job interview as a way of introduction to the program. The
next component of the program was the identification of prospective
accommodation needs by the students. The teams were also engaged in the
collaborative process of identifying barriers to the students’ adequate
performance in their chosen career fields and realistic accommodations
that would remove those barriers. The next step in the half-day APT
program was informing students of the employment provisions in Title I
of the ADA. After this informational portion of the program, students
participated in a role-play activity with the employers on their teams
to practice discussing their experiences, credentials, and accommodation
needs. The final phase of the program entailed creation of specific
goals and actions for the students’ job-seeking plans, integrating
information from the needs assessment, ADA awareness, and role-play
phases of the seminar. The team helped students to identify potential
employers and resources to facilitate their job search process. As
students exited the APT seminar and began their job searches, Project
Career staff members provided supports including direct referrals to
employers, job development to identify potential employers, and
selective placement assistance (Hanley-Maxwell, Bordieri, & Merz, 1996)
that directly matched students with available positions in their local
labor markets.
Burgstahler, S. (2001). A
collaborative model to promote career success for students
with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16,
209-216.
DO-IT
CAREERS: University of Washington. DO-IT
CAREERS is a program designed to assist students with disabilities to
become successful in finding and maintaining careers after graduation.
The program features holistic and collaborative approaches to enhancing
opportunities for students with disabilities to expand their work
experiences and related career skills (Burgstahler, 2001). Community
business leaders involve students with disabilities in various events,
panels, and electronic mail communication to expose them to successful
role models in their career fields. The program also contains an
educational component for employers, educators, and service providers
regarding the legal rights, needs, and capabilities of students with
disabilities. Also included in the program are parents and mentors who
encourage students to pursue postsecondary education and careers in
their chosen fields.
One of the key
components of the DO-IT CAREERS program is the encouragement of students
to actively develop their own careers. Key stakeholders in the career
success of students with disabilities include counselors, career
specialists, teachers, and other public school personnel; cooperative
education and career services staff at postsecondary institutions;
employers; government agencies; university faculty members; and parents
and mentors.
Staff members of the
DO-IT CAREERS program provide information to educators, employers,
agencies, and parents via printed materials, videotapes, and Internet
resources. These materials cover such varied subject areas as
accessibility solutions, medical information regarding specific
disabling conditions, career issues, learning approaches, and assistive
technology options. The staff also provides disability awareness
instruction for key stakeholders.
Getzel, E., Briel, L., & Kregel, J.
(2000). Comprehensive career planning: the VCU Career Connections
Program. Work, 14, 41-49.
Career Connections:
Virginia Commonwealth University. The Career Connections Program’s
aim is to provide career-oriented experiences and supports for students
with disabilities at any point in their college curricula. Getzel,
Briel, and Kregel (2000) explained that the service delivery model
includes the following emphases: the student’s academic program, the
right to use university resources, employment opportunities while
enrolled in classes, job placement assistance in coordination with
university career services, and post-employment follow along services in
combination with other state and local employment services.
Students may enter the
program at any point in their academic careers. Some enter after
receiving services and information from the Disability Support Service
office, whereas others enroll through advertisement of the program in
campus and community newspapers, through referrals from faculty members,
or through student advocacy organizations. After a student requests the
services of the Career Connections Program, an initial meeting is set to
explain the program and create an Individualized Career Plan for each
participant. The focus of this plan is on the career preparation needs
of the student and the supports and services essential to prepare him or
her to meet the goals he or she has established. The plan integrates
academic and community supports needed by the student to make certain
that he or she exits the academic institution with marketable skills and
associations with community resources once he or she enters the
workforce. The plan is self-directed by the student with the assistance
of the program’s staff. The Individualized Career Plan is continually
updated to ensure that appropriate measures are in place to help the
student achieve his or her goals.
Another key component of
the Career Connections Program is the work done with students to assist
them in identifying successful learner accommodations. Because little
is found in the literature regarding the transfer of accommodations to
the work setting (Rumrill et al., 1999), the program focuses on the
transfer of effective strategies from the classroom through a
chronological sequence of the pre-graduation work experience, to job
placement, and then through post-placement assistance. At each stage,
students are encouraged to explore how the accommodations they utilized
in their academic programs could meet their on-the-job needs.
Thompson, A., Bethea, L., & Satcher,
J. (1993). Employment guide for college
students with disabilities: The Career Development Project.
U.S. Department of Education: Office of Educational Research and
Improvement.
The Career
Development Project: Mississippi State University. The Career
Development Project was created to assist college students with
disabilities in the job search process in the context of their rights
under Title I the ADA (Thompson, Bethea, & Satcher, 1993). In the first
step of this project the ADA was explained to participating students
with disabilities and a clause by clause explanation was given regarding
the ADA’s definitions of such key terms as disability, qualified,
reasonable accommodation, and undue hardship. The next component of the
project outlined the ADA’s employment provisions regarding the job
applications, job interviews, employment choice and acceptance of
employment offers, and job accommodations. The project also assisted
students with adjustment to disability issues and determining the
advantages and consequences of disclosing disability status to
employers. Specific job search skills such as appearance; assessment of
work abilities, interests, and values; completing application forms;
creating a resume; preparing a job search plan; and locating job leads
were emphasized during individual and group counseling sessions with
participating students. Career adjustment issues were also addressed,
including job retention strategies, ongoing assessment of job
accommodation needs, monitoring changes in health or disability status,
utilizing vocational rehabilitation services, benefits planning, and
strategies to dispel myths and misconceptions about workers with
disabilities were also emphasized. As students prepared for graduation
and initiated their job searches, they were provided comprehensive
resource lists of agencies and organizations that could assist them in
seeking and securing employment.
The model career
programs for students with disabilities described in the preceding
paragraphs share recognition that students with disabilities require
supports and services over and above what is available to non-disabled
college students if they are to succeed in the world of work after
graduation. Accordingly, these programs all included career counseling,
job-seeking skills training, introductions to community mentors, and
work experience or internship programs. Career counseling is important
because students with disabilities rarely exit high school with well
developed career identities, primarily because they have limited
exposure to occupational information during the growth stage of career
development and are often excused from pre-career tasks such as
household chores and summer employment during high school (Wehman,
2001). Job-seeking skills training is important because available
evidence indicates that after graduation, students with disabilities can
expect to encounter significant difficulties in finding and securing
employment. Mentoring by members of the community is important because
it provides valuable insights to students with disabilities into the
professional labor market, and it increases the professional networks
that they can later draw upon in their post-graduation job searches.
Work experience through internships and practica experiences provides
students with disabilities the practical experience of working in their
chosen career fields and allows them to understand the work situations
they will be encountering after graduation.
|